De-labelling branded corporate-wear for re-use

Overview

This project looked in depth at de-labelling or de-branding technologies that might be utilised for end of life corporate-wear.

The purpose of this work was to identify commercially viable and emerging de-labelling or de-branding technologies that might be utilised for end of life corporate-wear and to assess their cost and carbon impacts alongside the economic benefits of garment re-use.

To properly assess their cost and carbon impacts this research covered four technologies that, although not currently widely applied, but might be appropriate for application to this area of corporate-wear de-branding.

The technologies are: Manual Unpicking, Microwave Treatment, Adhesives and Over-branding – and they are investigated in the case studies related to this report.

The primary audience for this work is the end of life reprocessors and corporate wear suppliers and manufacturers, but it will be of interest to all stakeholders within the corporate-wear life-cycle.

To find information in this report, you can jump directly to the relevant section using the contents menu or use the chapters below to browse the case studies included in this report:

Jump to:

Glossary for this report >>
Introduction >>
Technology review >>

Assessment Method >>
Carbon Impact Assessment >>
Cost Benefit Analysis >>
Assumptions common to cost and carbon >>

Results >>
Benchmark >>
Case study: Manual Unpicking >>
Case Study: Microwave Treatment >>
Case Study: Over-branding >>
Case Study: Adhesive Technology >>

Examination of options >>
Options for Further Work >>

Annex 1: Carbon impact assessment >>
Collection (Transport) >>
Sorting >>
End of life reprocessing >>
Distribution >>

Annex 2: Cost Benefit Analysis >>
Collection >>
Sorting (Work Space) >>
End of Life >>
Resale Value >>
Landfill and Incineration Avoidance >>
Benchmark Case >>
Manual Unpicking >>
Microwave Treatment >>
Over-branding >>
Adhesive Technology >>

Annex 3: Contacts >>

Download the full report >>

To find documents and articles related to this report:

Corporate workwear arisings and recovery opportunities >>
Evaluation of the end markets for textile rag and fibre within the UK >>
FM case study: Office Depot creates a uniform recycling solution >>

Case study 1: Carbon and costs impacts of microwave treatment for corporate-wear de-branding

This report presents the carbon impact assessment and cost benefit analysis carried out on the microwave treatment method, as developed by Wear2.

This technology was developed as part of a Technology Strategy Board (TSB) project focussing on developing new processes and introducing novel applications for materials. It aims assist the corporate clothing sector to reduce its environmental and societal burdens.Jump to:

Introduction >>
Summary of results >>
Carbon impact assessment >>
Cost benefit analysis >>
Summary / Conclusions >>

Download full case study >>

Case study 2: Carbon and cost impacts of manual unpicking for corporate-wear de-branding.

This case study presents the carbon impact assessment and cost benefit analysis carried out on manual unpicking method.

In the technology review this method was identified as having potential, although its current applications centre around removing care labels and neck labels. It was thought that for certain types of branding, for example where the embroidered badge is sewn onto a garment, manual unpicking would be a low technology route to achieve de-branding.

Jump to:

Introduction >>
Summary of results >>
Carbon impact assessment >>
Cost benefit analysis >>
Summary / Conclusions >>

Download full case study >>

Case study 3: Carbon and cost impacts of over-branding to enable corporate-wear re-use.

This case study presents the carbon impact assessment and cost benefit analysis carried out on the over-branding method.

This method is one that is currently of interest to corporate-wear procurers who have an interest in giving their uniforms a second life as garments. It involves simply attaching or embroidering directly, new branding over the top of old such that the previous brand is completely hidden. It is thought that there are no companies offering this as a service currently, but it is seen as a method that could be applied reasonably easily.

Jump to:

Introduction >>
Summary of results >>
Carbon impact assessment >>
Cost benefit analysis >>
Summary / Conclusions >>

Download full case study >>

Case study 4: Carbon and cost impacts of the adhesive technology method for corporate-wear de-branding.

This case study presents the carbon impact assessment and cost benefit analysis carried out on the adhesive technology method. Such a technology is provided by Ethical Badges, a company with an adhesive technology product which targets the removal of brands from uniforms, enabling the re-use of the garment.

Jump to:

Introduction >>
Summary of results >>
Carbon impact assessment >>
Cost benefit analysis >>
Summary / Conclusions >>

Download full case study >>

Where next?

Want to know more about re-use and recycling in sustainable textiles? Take a look at our reports, guides, tools and case studies for further information:

Reports >>
Guides >>
Tools >>
Case studies >>

We would be interested to know if you act upon any of this research. Please let us know by email to: products@wrap.org.uk

Back to:

Sustainable Textiles >>
Sustainable Clothing Action Plan (SCAP) >>
Re-use and recycling >>

De-labelling branded corporate-wear for re-use

Overview

Overview

Contents

Contents

Related

Related

Case study 1: Carbon and costs impacts of microwave treatment for corporate-wear de-branding

Case study 2: Carbon and cost impacts of manual unpicking for corporate-wear de-branding.

Case study 3: Carbon and cost impacts of over-branding to enable corporate-wear re-use.

Case study 4: Carbon and cost impacts of the adhesive technology method for corporate-wear de-branding.

Where next?

Priority areas

Role

Sector

What we offer

More from WRAP